I'm a little confused about why the U.S. should cough up $100 Billion per year to help other countries deal with their committments on UN regulation of "climate change." That means we will pay for it twice -- once in a subsidy through a corrupt organization (the UN) that will pass on a portion of it to corrupt governments (most of the developing world), and then in the increased price of goods that we will likely purchase from those very countries.
I know, $100 Billion doesn't sound like much now that we toss around numbers like $3 or $4 Trillion, but if you divide it by the current population of the U.S. it comes out to about $328 per person or $1,312 per family of 4. We probably need to double those numbers because of the increased cost of goods and services. No, we should probably triple it because the government is such an inefficient allocator of wealth that the true cost to our economy will be much larger than the $100 Billion.
Obama: World's Will on Climate Change 'Hangs in the Balance' at Copenhagen
Friday, December 18, 2009
Thursday, December 17, 2009
Mexican Drug Cartel "Boss-of-Bosses" Killed in Fight
The drug violence in Mexico has been rampant for an extended period. The Mexican government under President Felipe Calderon is fighting back but the battle is only beginning.
Top Mexican Drug Lord Killed in Fight With Law Enforcement
Now we will likely see a battle for control of the Beltran Leyva Cartel.
Top Mexican Drug Lord Killed in Fight With Law Enforcement
Now we will likely see a battle for control of the Beltran Leyva Cartel.
Wednesday, December 16, 2009
Regulating Cattle Emissions and Conspiracy Theories
OK. I’ve finally had enough of the ludicrous idea that the way to control greenhouse gases is to regulate emissions by livestock. I suspect it is really a plan to destroy the livestock industry by those who think we should all become Vegans. Or, maybe it is something even more sinister.
The carbon cycle is relatively simple to describe although its actions are complex. Living things are carbon-based. This includes plants and animals. Plants take carbon-dioxide out of the atmosphere, trap the carbon into their tissue in the form of various molecules such as sugars and then release Oxygen. Animals eat plants (or other animals) and through the process of digestion, break down the complex molecules (such as sugars) from the plant material and utilize the released energy to fuel their existence. In the process of digestion, some of the carbon is released back into the atmosphere as various gases and carbon dioxide is released through respiration. This process cycles the carbon in a somewhat continuous loop. Plants also release carbon when they die. The process of decomposition releases carbon into the atmosphere.
This carbon cycle has continued since the beginning of life on this planet. At one time in pre-history, there was significantly more carbon floating around in the atmosphere which fueled riotous growth of plants. Many of those plants were then trapped in sediment and over time changed to oil, gas and coal or were bound into limestone and other sedimentary rocks.
Until we began releasing the carbon that was “sequestered” in the form of oil, gas and coal, carbon wasn’t a problem. It was cycled through plants and animals just as it is today. It was this release from the utilization of fossil fuels of huge amounts of carbon back into the carbon cycle that created what some scientists today are claiming to be a cataclysmic problem for life on earth. In other words – it isn’t the cattle that are causing “climate change,” it is the burning of fossil fuels that released huge amounts of trapped carbon into the atmosphere that is causing the increase of atmospheric greenhouse gases.
So, why do our government and the governments of other nations throughout the world think the solution lies in regulating gas produced by cattle? Here is one possibility – it is part of the plan to control the world food supply. In the U.S. most crops are subsidized through various support payments. Livestock production is not. Placing regulations on the livestock producers under the guise of controlling greenhouse gas emissions makes sense only in the context of attempting to gain control of one of the few lightly regulated industries left.
It fits into what could be construed as a plan to force a one-world government. The way I see it, if one wanted to control the world you would begin with a series of induced crises. The crises would be designed to gain control of some key things – banking, energy and food. Hmmmm…..we recently saw manipulation of the first two of these items. That leaves food. I wonder what’s really going on behind the scenes in Copenhagen……
The carbon cycle is relatively simple to describe although its actions are complex. Living things are carbon-based. This includes plants and animals. Plants take carbon-dioxide out of the atmosphere, trap the carbon into their tissue in the form of various molecules such as sugars and then release Oxygen. Animals eat plants (or other animals) and through the process of digestion, break down the complex molecules (such as sugars) from the plant material and utilize the released energy to fuel their existence. In the process of digestion, some of the carbon is released back into the atmosphere as various gases and carbon dioxide is released through respiration. This process cycles the carbon in a somewhat continuous loop. Plants also release carbon when they die. The process of decomposition releases carbon into the atmosphere.
This carbon cycle has continued since the beginning of life on this planet. At one time in pre-history, there was significantly more carbon floating around in the atmosphere which fueled riotous growth of plants. Many of those plants were then trapped in sediment and over time changed to oil, gas and coal or were bound into limestone and other sedimentary rocks.
Until we began releasing the carbon that was “sequestered” in the form of oil, gas and coal, carbon wasn’t a problem. It was cycled through plants and animals just as it is today. It was this release from the utilization of fossil fuels of huge amounts of carbon back into the carbon cycle that created what some scientists today are claiming to be a cataclysmic problem for life on earth. In other words – it isn’t the cattle that are causing “climate change,” it is the burning of fossil fuels that released huge amounts of trapped carbon into the atmosphere that is causing the increase of atmospheric greenhouse gases.
So, why do our government and the governments of other nations throughout the world think the solution lies in regulating gas produced by cattle? Here is one possibility – it is part of the plan to control the world food supply. In the U.S. most crops are subsidized through various support payments. Livestock production is not. Placing regulations on the livestock producers under the guise of controlling greenhouse gas emissions makes sense only in the context of attempting to gain control of one of the few lightly regulated industries left.
It fits into what could be construed as a plan to force a one-world government. The way I see it, if one wanted to control the world you would begin with a series of induced crises. The crises would be designed to gain control of some key things – banking, energy and food. Hmmmm…..we recently saw manipulation of the first two of these items. That leaves food. I wonder what’s really going on behind the scenes in Copenhagen……
Labels:
agriculture,
Al Gore,
big government,
cattle,
climate,
livestock
Tuesday, October 20, 2009
Texas Constitutional Ammendments Ballot
The Texas and Southwestern Cattle Raisers Association has posted a guide to the upcoming ballot in Texas on proposed Constitutional Ammendments. These ammendments are all related to personal property rights. I urge you to seriously consider the implications these have for our state and for property owners.
http://www.texascattleraisers.org/dailyupdate/oct2009/2009electionguide.pdf
A more thorough analysis by the Texas Legislative Council is here.
http://www.texascattleraisers.org/dailyupdate/oct2009/2009electionguide.pdf
A more thorough analysis by the Texas Legislative Council is here.
Tuesday, August 25, 2009
A Young Employee's Take on ObamaCare
A young employee commented the other day that he was concerned about the Health Care Bill that Congress was considering and the President was pushing. I wondered why.
He said that if he understood correctly, what would happen is that the Health Care currently provided by his employer would go away and be replaced by a Health Care program offered by the Federal Government. If that happened, the amount the employer was currently providing on a pre-tax basis would then become taxable income. The Health Care offered by the government was likely to be very restrictive on its coverage and therefore inferior to what he was currently being provided. The net result is that if passed, he would get inferior Health coverage and pay more for it because now it was being taxed.
I said, "that's about right."
He said that if he understood correctly, what would happen is that the Health Care currently provided by his employer would go away and be replaced by a Health Care program offered by the Federal Government. If that happened, the amount the employer was currently providing on a pre-tax basis would then become taxable income. The Health Care offered by the government was likely to be very restrictive on its coverage and therefore inferior to what he was currently being provided. The net result is that if passed, he would get inferior Health coverage and pay more for it because now it was being taxed.
I said, "that's about right."
Labels:
big government,
Congress,
Democrat,
healthcare
Tuesday, August 11, 2009
Other States Are Watching Texas Business Success
For those of you who may not have seen it, the article linked below comes out of Washington -- the state, that is. It is about the Texas economy.
Texas Economy Shining Brightly Despite Recession
Texas Economy Shining Brightly Despite Recession
Wednesday, July 29, 2009
Perry on Limited Government
Limited government. Is it only a dream now? Have we gone too far to turn back?
Governor Rick Perry of Texas has some timely comments in today's Washington Times:
Perry: Texas Proves Limited Government Works
Governor Rick Perry of Texas has some timely comments in today's Washington Times:
Perry: Texas Proves Limited Government Works
Labels:
big government,
Congress,
Governor,
Obama,
Perry,
Texas,
Washington
Friday, July 24, 2009
Cornyn to Ag Committee
Agriculture is critical to the Texas Economy. The Texas economy is leading the nation. It is only fitting that Texas Senator John Cornyn be appointed to the Senate Ag Committee. We need conservative voices offsetting the shrill cry of the animal rights activists.
Senator Cornyn Appointed to Senate Ag Committee
Senator Cornyn Appointed to Senate Ag Committee
Labels:
agriculture,
Cornyn,
Senate,
Texas
Perry vs. Obama Care
The Governor of Texas has always been a strong proponent for business interests within the state. That is one of the reasons we have managed to weather the economic downturn so well. His stance on "Obama Care" is right in line with his sense of what is best for the business climate in Texas. The Healthcare package before Congress would put a number of small businesses out of business.
Businesses create jobs. Jobs put food on the table. Why anyone would ever think that forced charity and state control is better than self-reliance is beyond me.
Perry Raises Possibility of State's Rights Showdown With Whitehouse Over Healthcare
Businesses create jobs. Jobs put food on the table. Why anyone would ever think that forced charity and state control is better than self-reliance is beyond me.
Perry Raises Possibility of State's Rights Showdown With Whitehouse Over Healthcare
Labels:
big government,
Governor,
healthcare,
Obama,
Perry,
Texas
Thursday, July 23, 2009
Michael Williams at Entrepreneur Alliance in Amarillo
Texas Railroad Commission Chairman Michael Williams is in Amarillo today. I had the opportunity to visit with him briefly when he stopped at the Entrepreneur Alliance offices.
It was a fitting setting for the U.S. Senate Candidate whose message is music to the ears of Texas businessmen. He is one of the few principled and consistent conservative political figures in the country. His message is pro-business and pro-USA.
He spoke briefly on a topic that sends chills up my spine -- the Cap and Trade Scheme that Congress is working to pass. According to Williams (and I agree completely) it will have a disproportionately negative impact on Texas. It targets energy and agriculture for a significant tax burden that would cripple the state economy. I like the way he referred to it as the bill that would "cap our economy and send trade somewhere else." I think that sums it up.
Texas is one of the few states that has had positive news through the economic downturn that our country has been experiencing. That positive news is due to our pro-business economic climate. Cap and Trade will reverse those positives.
Commissioner Williams has been a public servant for 10 years on the Texas Railroad Commission. During that time he played a significant role in shrinking the size of the Commission from around 900 employees to about 600.
Hmm....smaller government, pro-business, pro-family, pro-USA...we could use some of that in Washington. With his record of integrity in office and the conservative positions that he has taken on the issues near-and-dear to all Texans, I think it is time to get him up there so that he can get to work.
I wonder what Senator Hutchison's plans are? Will she resign her seat? Or, will she try to hold onto it through the upcoming race for Governor? It promises to be interesting....
It was a fitting setting for the U.S. Senate Candidate whose message is music to the ears of Texas businessmen. He is one of the few principled and consistent conservative political figures in the country. His message is pro-business and pro-USA.
He spoke briefly on a topic that sends chills up my spine -- the Cap and Trade Scheme that Congress is working to pass. According to Williams (and I agree completely) it will have a disproportionately negative impact on Texas. It targets energy and agriculture for a significant tax burden that would cripple the state economy. I like the way he referred to it as the bill that would "cap our economy and send trade somewhere else." I think that sums it up.
Texas is one of the few states that has had positive news through the economic downturn that our country has been experiencing. That positive news is due to our pro-business economic climate. Cap and Trade will reverse those positives.
Commissioner Williams has been a public servant for 10 years on the Texas Railroad Commission. During that time he played a significant role in shrinking the size of the Commission from around 900 employees to about 600.
Hmm....smaller government, pro-business, pro-family, pro-USA...we could use some of that in Washington. With his record of integrity in office and the conservative positions that he has taken on the issues near-and-dear to all Texans, I think it is time to get him up there so that he can get to work.
I wonder what Senator Hutchison's plans are? Will she resign her seat? Or, will she try to hold onto it through the upcoming race for Governor? It promises to be interesting....
Saturday, July 4, 2009
On This 4th of July
On July 4, 1776, we declared our independence from Great Britain. We claimed the right to self-governance with representation of the people's will in determination of the laws of our land. We claimed the right to reject an oppressive government and replace it with one that was both responsive to and responsible to the people of this land.
That oppression arose from our dependency on Great Britain. The original colonists needed the support of the mother country for survival. In return, the king required taxes. Those taxes paid for wars that caused a mounting debt. The response of the king was to increase taxes to finance his aggressive policies that sought to consolidate his power.
The people sought relief from the burden but were ignored. They sought representation of their views but were rejected. Over time, their dependency allowed the king to increase taxes to the point they could no longer be borne by the people and they rebelled.
Through the blood of committed individuals that Independence was accomplished over the course of 40+ years when we finally severed the control of Great Britain in the War of 1812. Yet, it didn't end there. We remained a nation seeking to find its way. We continued to seek a balance of power in how we were governed which culminated in a Civil War that consolidated power in the federal government. It was a result that led to better relations between the various races which comprise our people, but eroded the power of the people by consolidating it in the hands of the federal government.
We have survived global wars in which the United States came to the aid of nations whose values resembled our own. We have gone wherever necessary to combat the tendency of man to consolidate power through aggression. Yet we have allowed special interests to consolidate power within our own borders.
We have struggled with our own identity. We are a nation of many varied yet closely held beliefs. We have faced many issues that arise from the human frailties of self-interest and fear. We have made great strides in creating an environment of equality of opportunity for all. Yet we have allowed those same frailties of self-interest and fear to be used against us by the very politicians we elected to serve us.
We continue to struggle. Today we face some of the greatest challenges that we have ever faced as a nation. Many of those challenges are the result of the quest for power of individuals and groups who have only their self-interest at heart. They seek power for gain and not in service for the good of the nation and its people. They bully and intimidate through the power of the purse.
That such individuals and groups hold the reins of power is the fault of the people. Enough of us have allowed ourselves to be subjugated to the carefully orchestrated largess of the state and federal powers that our Independence has been lost. That subjugation has resulted in efforts to further consolidate power through expanding government services in ways that create further dependency. We see today an aggressive expansion and consolidation of power through the use of regulation and welfare (although not always by that name). We have become a nation controlled by dependency. Therein lies our downfall.
Our dependency on the government has created a situation of mounting debt that must be repaid. It is the tendency in such times to use taxation to repay the debt. The burden of government has become oppressive. We are facing a crisis in our nation that in many ways resembles the conditions prior to the War for Independence. It is time once again for our government to become both responsive to and responsible to the people.
(also posted at Panhandle Poetry and Other Thoughts)
That oppression arose from our dependency on Great Britain. The original colonists needed the support of the mother country for survival. In return, the king required taxes. Those taxes paid for wars that caused a mounting debt. The response of the king was to increase taxes to finance his aggressive policies that sought to consolidate his power.
The people sought relief from the burden but were ignored. They sought representation of their views but were rejected. Over time, their dependency allowed the king to increase taxes to the point they could no longer be borne by the people and they rebelled.
Through the blood of committed individuals that Independence was accomplished over the course of 40+ years when we finally severed the control of Great Britain in the War of 1812. Yet, it didn't end there. We remained a nation seeking to find its way. We continued to seek a balance of power in how we were governed which culminated in a Civil War that consolidated power in the federal government. It was a result that led to better relations between the various races which comprise our people, but eroded the power of the people by consolidating it in the hands of the federal government.
We have survived global wars in which the United States came to the aid of nations whose values resembled our own. We have gone wherever necessary to combat the tendency of man to consolidate power through aggression. Yet we have allowed special interests to consolidate power within our own borders.
We have struggled with our own identity. We are a nation of many varied yet closely held beliefs. We have faced many issues that arise from the human frailties of self-interest and fear. We have made great strides in creating an environment of equality of opportunity for all. Yet we have allowed those same frailties of self-interest and fear to be used against us by the very politicians we elected to serve us.
We continue to struggle. Today we face some of the greatest challenges that we have ever faced as a nation. Many of those challenges are the result of the quest for power of individuals and groups who have only their self-interest at heart. They seek power for gain and not in service for the good of the nation and its people. They bully and intimidate through the power of the purse.
That such individuals and groups hold the reins of power is the fault of the people. Enough of us have allowed ourselves to be subjugated to the carefully orchestrated largess of the state and federal powers that our Independence has been lost. That subjugation has resulted in efforts to further consolidate power through expanding government services in ways that create further dependency. We see today an aggressive expansion and consolidation of power through the use of regulation and welfare (although not always by that name). We have become a nation controlled by dependency. Therein lies our downfall.
Our dependency on the government has created a situation of mounting debt that must be repaid. It is the tendency in such times to use taxation to repay the debt. The burden of government has become oppressive. We are facing a crisis in our nation that in many ways resembles the conditions prior to the War for Independence. It is time once again for our government to become both responsive to and responsible to the people.
(also posted at Panhandle Poetry and Other Thoughts)
Labels:
big government,
independence,
power
Sunday, June 7, 2009
A Letter to Sandy
Sandy,
You asked for my Perspective. Right now, with the path our nation is following, it is difficult to keep things in Perspective. I want to cry out in frustration.
Perhaps that is the answer. To cry out. We should cry out to Our God and ask for His healing hand upon our country.
As a nation we have drifted so far from a Christian Biblical Perspective that it will take generations to return to the values upon which our country was founded. But, that is an answer of little faith.
God is the answer. He calls us to deliver that answer with the words of Jesus in Matthew 28: 19-20.
"...19Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, 20and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. And surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age."
Ultimately, that is the answer. To win hearts and minds to Jesus -- one individual at a time. Then and only then will we turn this country around.
The present administration is filled with power-hungry individuals whose only god is power and whose religion is pragmatism. They may speak of principles, but they hold only to those principles which maintain or expand their power base.
It is cathartic to rail against the administration, but that is the wrong target. The target of our anger should be ourselves. We have failed to deliver the Word of Truth to those who need it desperately. We instead became complacent in our wealth and became the proverbial "frogs-in-a-pot of water." The heat was slowly adjusted and we are now in danger of death of our way of life.
That is my Perspective. We each must GO to our sphere of influence and win hearts and souls to the Gospel of Jesus the Christ. Until we become a nation of Christians (note that I did not say a Christian nation), things will not change.
Thank you for your comment Sandy. I hope that you are not disappointed in my answer.
Panhandle Poet
You asked for my Perspective. Right now, with the path our nation is following, it is difficult to keep things in Perspective. I want to cry out in frustration.
Perhaps that is the answer. To cry out. We should cry out to Our God and ask for His healing hand upon our country.
As a nation we have drifted so far from a Christian Biblical Perspective that it will take generations to return to the values upon which our country was founded. But, that is an answer of little faith.
God is the answer. He calls us to deliver that answer with the words of Jesus in Matthew 28: 19-20.
"...19Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, 20and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. And surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age."
Ultimately, that is the answer. To win hearts and minds to Jesus -- one individual at a time. Then and only then will we turn this country around.
The present administration is filled with power-hungry individuals whose only god is power and whose religion is pragmatism. They may speak of principles, but they hold only to those principles which maintain or expand their power base.
It is cathartic to rail against the administration, but that is the wrong target. The target of our anger should be ourselves. We have failed to deliver the Word of Truth to those who need it desperately. We instead became complacent in our wealth and became the proverbial "frogs-in-a-pot of water." The heat was slowly adjusted and we are now in danger of death of our way of life.
That is my Perspective. We each must GO to our sphere of influence and win hearts and souls to the Gospel of Jesus the Christ. Until we become a nation of Christians (note that I did not say a Christian nation), things will not change.
Thank you for your comment Sandy. I hope that you are not disappointed in my answer.
Panhandle Poet
Tuesday, May 5, 2009
Strong Feelings
One hundred plus days of pure torture. The demise of our nation has been set in motion.
Monday, April 20, 2009
Not Without Guilt 2 (A Working Title)
I continue below with thoughts on the divisions within our nation. It is best considered as a continuation of the post linked in the first line of the body. It also is incomplete -- merely a beginning at looking at the divisions within the United States.
Education is obviously one of the issues that must be considered when we look again at the CNN example of the destroyed repossessed homes. But again, we must dig into the question of what we mean by education. This brings up the moral and cultural issues that are at the heart of our divided nation. We must seek to bridge the gap between at least two radically different ways of viewing the world.
So, where to begin? I think first we must look at different ways in which individuals are “educated.”
When we speak of education, the most common frame of reference is the public school system. It is the body to which we have consigned our children in the expectation that they will be provided with a basic set of skills which will allow them to not only function properly within society but which will allow them to succeed. But, then, I’m looking at education from my frame of reference which differs from some other group’s point-of-view.
If we look at a poor single mother who is trying to raise children, provide an income and basically just survive on her own, she may not see school so much as a place where her offspring can obtain a basic set of skills as she sees it as a babysitter. Perhaps she sees it merely as a place to keep those children out of her hair while she lies in a drugged stupor. Perhaps – well, there are thousands of “perhaps” that could encompass only a portion of the potential scenarios. But, what is a key here is that we first realize that the public schools are being asked to function in a role for which they were not designed. They should not be babysitters. They were designed to function as a place of learning for those who are motivated to learn – either through the threat of punishment from a parent who wanted the situation of their children to be improved from their own, or because the child truly desired to learn and improve his own situation. That is often not what we have today.
So, we see that the public schools as a source of education is a barely functioning entity today because it is tasked with goals for which it was not designed and is inadequately prepared. That leaves us with other forms of education.
The greatest source of education is a mentor. Most often, a mentor – especially for young children – is a parent who seeks to create a desire for learning and a sense of purpose for that desire. What happens to that portion of the learning process when both parents are working sixty hour weeks because they want to “get ahead” in life? What happens when the child is reared in a single-parent home in which survival takes precedence over special attentions to the needs of the child? What happens when the influences of our friends and neighbors seek to degrade the desire for success by replacing it with a desire for disruption or excess? What happens when the family is disconnected in such a way that “extended” family members are merely a phone number or address in a book and not a vital part of life? Grandparents can sometimes fill the role of a mentor when the circumstances cause an inability on the part of the parents. The disintegration of the family is a factor in the failure of our children to obtain an education that will lead them to function well in society.
...perhaps to be continued.
Education is obviously one of the issues that must be considered when we look again at the CNN example of the destroyed repossessed homes. But again, we must dig into the question of what we mean by education. This brings up the moral and cultural issues that are at the heart of our divided nation. We must seek to bridge the gap between at least two radically different ways of viewing the world.
So, where to begin? I think first we must look at different ways in which individuals are “educated.”
When we speak of education, the most common frame of reference is the public school system. It is the body to which we have consigned our children in the expectation that they will be provided with a basic set of skills which will allow them to not only function properly within society but which will allow them to succeed. But, then, I’m looking at education from my frame of reference which differs from some other group’s point-of-view.
If we look at a poor single mother who is trying to raise children, provide an income and basically just survive on her own, she may not see school so much as a place where her offspring can obtain a basic set of skills as she sees it as a babysitter. Perhaps she sees it merely as a place to keep those children out of her hair while she lies in a drugged stupor. Perhaps – well, there are thousands of “perhaps” that could encompass only a portion of the potential scenarios. But, what is a key here is that we first realize that the public schools are being asked to function in a role for which they were not designed. They should not be babysitters. They were designed to function as a place of learning for those who are motivated to learn – either through the threat of punishment from a parent who wanted the situation of their children to be improved from their own, or because the child truly desired to learn and improve his own situation. That is often not what we have today.
So, we see that the public schools as a source of education is a barely functioning entity today because it is tasked with goals for which it was not designed and is inadequately prepared. That leaves us with other forms of education.
The greatest source of education is a mentor. Most often, a mentor – especially for young children – is a parent who seeks to create a desire for learning and a sense of purpose for that desire. What happens to that portion of the learning process when both parents are working sixty hour weeks because they want to “get ahead” in life? What happens when the child is reared in a single-parent home in which survival takes precedence over special attentions to the needs of the child? What happens when the influences of our friends and neighbors seek to degrade the desire for success by replacing it with a desire for disruption or excess? What happens when the family is disconnected in such a way that “extended” family members are merely a phone number or address in a book and not a vital part of life? Grandparents can sometimes fill the role of a mentor when the circumstances cause an inability on the part of the parents. The disintegration of the family is a factor in the failure of our children to obtain an education that will lead them to function well in society.
...perhaps to be continued.
Sunday, April 19, 2009
Misdirected Behavior
After being out of town so much lately I had to spend my Sunday afternoon paying bills. Now, I'm always thankful that I can pay my bills but it isn't one of my favorite tasks. What got to me today was that one of the checks that I wrote was to GMAC. The thought occurred to me that GMAC is part of GM. The government just poured a bunch of money into them -- which I've been doing off-and-on for much of my life. So, now I'm paying them twice -- once with a coupon and once in my tax bill. Somehow that just doesn't seem right to me. I've always paid my bills. My credit is good. I don't owe much money but when I do owe someone I pay them.
Suddenly it occurred to me that those of us who seek to do the right thing and work to take care of our obligations are penalized for our good behavior while those who do the opposite are rewarded for their bad behavior. Hmm....I wonder if that is what the "Tea Parties" were really about.....
The Administration still doesn't get it.
Axelrod: Tea Party Anger is Misdirected
Suddenly it occurred to me that those of us who seek to do the right thing and work to take care of our obligations are penalized for our good behavior while those who do the opposite are rewarded for their bad behavior. Hmm....I wonder if that is what the "Tea Parties" were really about.....
The Administration still doesn't get it.
Axelrod: Tea Party Anger is Misdirected
Friday, April 17, 2009
Not Without Guilt (A Working Title)
I present below, what might be considered the beginning of an essay -- or, perhaps it is the entirety of the essay in the event that I decide not to continue. Whatever it is, it is only a small piece of the puzzle that must be solved if the nation that we call the UNITED States of America is to truly be re-UNITED into a single nation. Today, we are not UNITED. Anyway, here are some thoughts....
Today as I ate my pizza from the buffet line at Gatti’s in Bowling Green, Kentucky, I watched CNN Headline News on the big-screen television hanging on the wall. Please realize that I don’t normally watch CNN, just as I don’t watch MSNBC or NBC or CBS or ABC news as a general rule. I find that their biases often get in the way of their reporting. However, when the proprietor has the television set to a particular channel, that’s usually what you are stuck with – just like in the breakfast area of whatever motel chain I happen to be using as my current home-away-from-home.
Anyway, the talking heads seemed incredulous that the repossessed homes in the particular Chicago area neighborhood where they had chosen to base their “news” story were in terrible shape. Commodes were ripped from the floor, there were holes in the walls, doors were off their hinges, trash was piled everywhere and the general shape of the property was worse than pitiful. The reporters seemed shocked that the homes were in such condition and felt certain that it could only be because of the ill treatment of the previous “owners” by whatever lender that had so viciously evicted them.
Is it a symptom, or is it the disease? I’m of course referring to the reaction of the newscasters, not the behavior of the previous occupants of the repossessed houses – but, then again, the same question could be asked about those former occupants. Was their behavior a symptom, or was it the disease? However, upon further reflection, perhaps we should define “what” behavior is the object of our question. Are we observing a behavior of protest at poor treatment, or are we observing a general attitude about life and a lack of caring for property? Is it an issue of education? Is it an issue of an oppressed group of citizens? Is it the result of drug abuse? Is it something else altogether?
There are no easy answers, just as there are no easy questions – at least no easy questions that have been properly framed with clearly definable intent. I believe the frame of reference from which the “talking heads” were seeking to deliver a “newsworthy” story was so totally foreign to the actual events about which they were reporting that they had no idea of how to pose proper questions or in any way to relate to the events. They fell back instead on the dogma of their beliefs – namely, that it was an issue of victims and bad guys – of course, the actor of bad behavior is never the bad guy, it is always the one who suffered at their hands that was being punished for bad behavior – i.e. the bank, or landlord, or the builder, or whoever.
The age-old dilemma of communication between men and women is a piece-of-cake compared to the ability of the liberal media to communicate with the average human being in the United States – or the other way around. (I considered including all people but really have no good concept of the ability of media in other countries to connect with their people – although I suspect the issue is universal.) Why is it that way? Is it due to cultural biases? Is it a result of education? Is it a function of personality types that seek media careers as opposed to those who don’t? What exactly makes it so difficult for media figures to connect with the average person? Is it an elitism springing from a career-based attitude that inculcates the “successful” media personalities? Whatever the source, there is clearly a disconnection between the reporters and their subjects – unless they are talking of other media types – which would include television, movie and many music personalities.
So, where am I going with this? I guess I am seeking to reason through what is happening in our country. The example of the CNN Headline News reporters is a symptom of many things. It is a manifestation of deep moral and cultural issues that are on the verge of tearing apart the basis for our nation – that is, the ability to present reasoned arguments and through the art of seeking accommodation through shared values and balanced compromise to arrive at solutions to issues of the day by seeking the common good. There is no commonality. There is instead a deep divide that is growing wider by the day. If it is not addressed, it will bring about the end of the United States of America – not just as we know it – but as a nation.
Today as I ate my pizza from the buffet line at Gatti’s in Bowling Green, Kentucky, I watched CNN Headline News on the big-screen television hanging on the wall. Please realize that I don’t normally watch CNN, just as I don’t watch MSNBC or NBC or CBS or ABC news as a general rule. I find that their biases often get in the way of their reporting. However, when the proprietor has the television set to a particular channel, that’s usually what you are stuck with – just like in the breakfast area of whatever motel chain I happen to be using as my current home-away-from-home.
Anyway, the talking heads seemed incredulous that the repossessed homes in the particular Chicago area neighborhood where they had chosen to base their “news” story were in terrible shape. Commodes were ripped from the floor, there were holes in the walls, doors were off their hinges, trash was piled everywhere and the general shape of the property was worse than pitiful. The reporters seemed shocked that the homes were in such condition and felt certain that it could only be because of the ill treatment of the previous “owners” by whatever lender that had so viciously evicted them.
Is it a symptom, or is it the disease? I’m of course referring to the reaction of the newscasters, not the behavior of the previous occupants of the repossessed houses – but, then again, the same question could be asked about those former occupants. Was their behavior a symptom, or was it the disease? However, upon further reflection, perhaps we should define “what” behavior is the object of our question. Are we observing a behavior of protest at poor treatment, or are we observing a general attitude about life and a lack of caring for property? Is it an issue of education? Is it an issue of an oppressed group of citizens? Is it the result of drug abuse? Is it something else altogether?
There are no easy answers, just as there are no easy questions – at least no easy questions that have been properly framed with clearly definable intent. I believe the frame of reference from which the “talking heads” were seeking to deliver a “newsworthy” story was so totally foreign to the actual events about which they were reporting that they had no idea of how to pose proper questions or in any way to relate to the events. They fell back instead on the dogma of their beliefs – namely, that it was an issue of victims and bad guys – of course, the actor of bad behavior is never the bad guy, it is always the one who suffered at their hands that was being punished for bad behavior – i.e. the bank, or landlord, or the builder, or whoever.
The age-old dilemma of communication between men and women is a piece-of-cake compared to the ability of the liberal media to communicate with the average human being in the United States – or the other way around. (I considered including all people but really have no good concept of the ability of media in other countries to connect with their people – although I suspect the issue is universal.) Why is it that way? Is it due to cultural biases? Is it a result of education? Is it a function of personality types that seek media careers as opposed to those who don’t? What exactly makes it so difficult for media figures to connect with the average person? Is it an elitism springing from a career-based attitude that inculcates the “successful” media personalities? Whatever the source, there is clearly a disconnection between the reporters and their subjects – unless they are talking of other media types – which would include television, movie and many music personalities.
So, where am I going with this? I guess I am seeking to reason through what is happening in our country. The example of the CNN Headline News reporters is a symptom of many things. It is a manifestation of deep moral and cultural issues that are on the verge of tearing apart the basis for our nation – that is, the ability to present reasoned arguments and through the art of seeking accommodation through shared values and balanced compromise to arrive at solutions to issues of the day by seeking the common good. There is no commonality. There is instead a deep divide that is growing wider by the day. If it is not addressed, it will bring about the end of the United States of America – not just as we know it – but as a nation.
Thursday, April 16, 2009
Quoting Scriptures and Disavowing Jesus versus A Different Beat
The more I see, the more I wonder....
Georgetown University Hid Religious Symbols at White House Request
...and yes, anyone can quote scripture -- out of context, in a manner that is used to mislead the unwary.
And then there's the real deal....
Palin Returns to National Spotlight at Right-to-Life Dinner
Political experts and leftist know-it-alls want to put her into a box. It won't work. I believe that she travels to the beat of a different drummer and her drummer knows what He's doing.
Georgetown University Hid Religious Symbols at White House Request
...and yes, anyone can quote scripture -- out of context, in a manner that is used to mislead the unwary.
And then there's the real deal....
Palin Returns to National Spotlight at Right-to-Life Dinner
Political experts and leftist know-it-alls want to put her into a box. It won't work. I believe that she travels to the beat of a different drummer and her drummer knows what He's doing.
Resistance is NOT Futile
It will be very difficult to sustain a grassroots movement among Conservatives because of their very nature, however, we have a start with the Tea Parties conducted yesterday. There are a lot of disaffected people in this country right now -- especially when you get out of the cities and into the Heartland where there is still productivity which results from a strong work ethic and sense of independence instead of dependence on the Federal largess. My home state of Texas is one of those states where we see the backlash against the extreme growth in federal power is growing quickly. On at least some levels, it is being fueled by some of our leading political figures. The article linked below is an example:
Governor Says Texans May Want to Secede From Union But Probably Won't
The real question to me is this: Governor Perry, are you truly serious about taking control back from Washington or is this all just political rhetoric in light of the race to retain the Governor's mansion?
We have two of the more conservative Senators in Washington but even they are not immune to the corrupting influences of power politics played on the national stage. I pray that they will fight the fight of the people and resist the forces that are moving us toward -- not Socialism -- but, an all pervasive and invasive government that seeks to run every aspect of our lives. That my friends is something to be feared. It is all about power and that power was handed to a group of people who, under the guise of the Democratic Party, will stop at nothing to consolidate their hold on the reins of power. If they are not stopped now, it will become increasingly difficult to stem the tide of corruption and government invasion into our lives. We must create a groundswell of resistance to the tide of Big Government that is washing over our country. It will be a long and arduous fight that is difficult to sustain but it must be done if we wish to save the United States.
Governor Says Texans May Want to Secede From Union But Probably Won't
The real question to me is this: Governor Perry, are you truly serious about taking control back from Washington or is this all just political rhetoric in light of the race to retain the Governor's mansion?
We have two of the more conservative Senators in Washington but even they are not immune to the corrupting influences of power politics played on the national stage. I pray that they will fight the fight of the people and resist the forces that are moving us toward -- not Socialism -- but, an all pervasive and invasive government that seeks to run every aspect of our lives. That my friends is something to be feared. It is all about power and that power was handed to a group of people who, under the guise of the Democratic Party, will stop at nothing to consolidate their hold on the reins of power. If they are not stopped now, it will become increasingly difficult to stem the tide of corruption and government invasion into our lives. We must create a groundswell of resistance to the tide of Big Government that is washing over our country. It will be a long and arduous fight that is difficult to sustain but it must be done if we wish to save the United States.
Tuesday, April 14, 2009
New Definitions From Big Brother
As you read the article linked below, take special note of the items quoted below the link.
Federal agency warns of radicals on right
"...as including not just racist or hate groups, but also groups that reject federal authority in favor of state or local authority. "
"It may include groups and individuals that are dedicated to a single-issue, such as opposition to abortion or immigration...."
Federal agency warns of radicals on right
"...as including not just racist or hate groups, but also groups that reject federal authority in favor of state or local authority. "
"It may include groups and individuals that are dedicated to a single-issue, such as opposition to abortion or immigration...."
10th Amendment
I am sometimes a little slow in catching up on the news. Below I've linked an article that includes a video of Texas Governor Rick Perry announcing his support of the HCR 50 that addresses the subject of state's rights versus federal intrusion. It is worth reading and the video is worth viewing. I must admit that I chuckle at the video for the reason that the Governor's speaking style is somewhat reminiscent of his predecessor.
Gov. Perry Backs Resolution Affirming Texas’ Sovereignty Under 10th Amendment
I still see the likelihood of Governor Perry running to replace Senator Hutchinson in Washington and Senator Hutchinson running for the Governor's mansion. Don't you love Texas politics??
Gov. Perry Backs Resolution Affirming Texas’ Sovereignty Under 10th Amendment
I still see the likelihood of Governor Perry running to replace Senator Hutchinson in Washington and Senator Hutchinson running for the Governor's mansion. Don't you love Texas politics??
Monday, April 13, 2009
Easter Demonstrated
There are a couple of great news stories out there right now. I've linked them below.
The first is a demonstration that Americans still can stand up and do what is necessary. It is a tribute to our military and to the individual spirit of a man.
Trio of Shots Ended Sea Standoff; Pirates Vow to Retaliate
The second one is another story in which the efforts of fellow Americans helped to save lives. It is also a testimony to the faith of a family.
Passenger Safely Lands Plane After Pilot Dies
It is interesting to me that both of these events occurred around Easter. Both stories are about salvation. They are vivid reminders that we all need saving. There is only ONE way to true SALVATION and that is by accepting Jesus as Savior and setting aside our own life to allow Him to live through us. It's all about overcoming evil and saving lives.
The first is a demonstration that Americans still can stand up and do what is necessary. It is a tribute to our military and to the individual spirit of a man.
Trio of Shots Ended Sea Standoff; Pirates Vow to Retaliate
The second one is another story in which the efforts of fellow Americans helped to save lives. It is also a testimony to the faith of a family.
Passenger Safely Lands Plane After Pilot Dies
It is interesting to me that both of these events occurred around Easter. Both stories are about salvation. They are vivid reminders that we all need saving. There is only ONE way to true SALVATION and that is by accepting Jesus as Savior and setting aside our own life to allow Him to live through us. It's all about overcoming evil and saving lives.
Friday, April 10, 2009
Our Deluded Public
The results of the Rasmussen Poll linked below are a symptom of several things. 1) The heavy influence of the left in our educational system, 2) The large number of people dependent on Federal and State largess, 3) The liberal bias of the media that continually preaches the ills of capitalism and 4) The greed that many capitalists exhibit. I'm sure there are more but the whole subject is depressing to me.
Just 53% Say Capitalism Better Than Socialism
It also means that 47% are clueless or totally misinformed....
Just 53% Say Capitalism Better Than Socialism
It also means that 47% are clueless or totally misinformed....
Labels:
capitalism,
economy,
liberal bias
And Still Counting....
I suspect his number may be low but....
Bachus says there's 17 'socialists' in House
...and how many in the Executive???
Bachus says there's 17 'socialists' in House
...and how many in the Executive???
Wednesday, April 8, 2009
Tuesday, April 7, 2009
No One Knows the Time
While the President is trotting the globe demonstrating his oratorical skills, I wonder if the picture painted by his country-hopping parade is merely emblematic of his true vision of being the "savior" of the world? The entire scenario causes fear to curdle the contents of my stomach as the portrait of the Antichrist described in the book of Revelation comes to mind. I realize that it is much too early to tell, but it is difficult to get such a thought out of my head.
I find solace only in the fact that no one knows the time.....
I find solace only in the fact that no one knows the time.....
Saturday, April 4, 2009
It's All About Power and Control -- er, is that redundant???
Stuart Varney wrote an excellent article for the Wall Street Journal concerning banks repaying the TARP money. Follow the link below.....
Obama Wants to Control the Banks
There's a reason he refuses to accept repayment of TARP money.
Obama Wants to Control the Banks
There's a reason he refuses to accept repayment of TARP money.
Rockets Away!
It will be interesting to see how Mr. Obama responds to the North Korean rocket launch. I suspect we will see a repeat of Bill Clinton's do-nothing approach -- except with even more rhetoric.
The administration has somewhat painted itself into a corner. It appears that Mr. Obama has obtained some political capital among world leaders -- especially in Europe. Will he spend it in the U.N. Security Council? I doubt that he knows how to wield it effectively -- which begs the question -- who will he turn to for advice? Sarkozy? -- no -- Medvedev?? -- possibly -- Hillary? -- I wonder just how much power she truly has within the administration.... She might just ask Bill -- which brings us back to the first paragraph. Ultimately, I suspect it will be a matter of whatever "polls" best. Which again is reminiscent of Bill Clinton. I guess we should expect no less when we elect leaders who have no moral compass.
Now, the real question is what SHOULD we do????
The administration has somewhat painted itself into a corner. It appears that Mr. Obama has obtained some political capital among world leaders -- especially in Europe. Will he spend it in the U.N. Security Council? I doubt that he knows how to wield it effectively -- which begs the question -- who will he turn to for advice? Sarkozy? -- no -- Medvedev?? -- possibly -- Hillary? -- I wonder just how much power she truly has within the administration.... She might just ask Bill -- which brings us back to the first paragraph. Ultimately, I suspect it will be a matter of whatever "polls" best. Which again is reminiscent of Bill Clinton. I guess we should expect no less when we elect leaders who have no moral compass.
Now, the real question is what SHOULD we do????
Labels:
Clinton,
North Korea,
Obama
Money and Politics -- The Usual
It is obvious to me that agriculture doesn't wield much political power with the current administration. I guess there aren't enough voters who make a living from agriculture for it to be worthwhile for them to apply the federal largesse to this particular segment of the economy. Maybe, they just realize that this is a group whose votes can't be easily swayed by the application of large sums of money. It's much easier to obtain votes among the unions by pouring dollars into industries where they are strong. Besides, what's a few Billion among the Trillions that are being spent????
I must again repeat the quote of Benjamin Franklin -- "When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic. Sell not liberty to purchase power."
I must again repeat the quote of Benjamin Franklin -- "When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic. Sell not liberty to purchase power."
Labels:
agriculture,
big government
Friday, April 3, 2009
Words.....
One thing about our current President cannot be disputed -- he delivers a speech well (of course, teleprompters are helpful). Not only has he "wowed" a majority of the U.S. populace with his oratory, he is doing the same in Europe. The words "smooth operator" come to my mind. One of the more interesting things to me is the response of some of the other "world leaders" to his words. I especially find it interesting that one has chosen to embrace his "comrade" so openly. The words we choose can be so empty (e.g. "change") -- or so meaningful......
Wednesday, April 1, 2009
Is It Transparency or Something Else?
During the Bush administration I decided to subscribe to the White House news feed from their official site. That subscription has continued under the current administration. The volume of items coming across on the feed has swamped my Google Reader. I'm certain the administration would chalk it up to more "transparency" from the White House. I must admit that I don't thoroughly read all of the releases -- it would be a full time job. However, from the ones that I have read, I've come to the conclusion that it's not transparency at all. It is propaganda. It is a never-ending litany of the "look-what-I-did-to-further-the-Godless-liberal-agenda" propaganda machine. I'm now depressed.......
Sunday, March 15, 2009
Digging Deeper Holes
Don't you love it when the government continues to get it wrong? Too much debt is one of the problems that plagues many small businesses yet, the current administration feels that it must get them in deeper through government guarantees and other lending mechanisms. What is really needed is for the government to remove some of the regulatory burden and reduce their taxes. That will free their money to invest in their business.
If the problem is cash flow, what good will new borrowing do? Let small businesses keep more of their cash and they will figure a way to survive.
If the problem is cash flow, what good will new borrowing do? Let small businesses keep more of their cash and they will figure a way to survive.
Tuesday, March 3, 2009
Tea-bags and Left Turns
How far left before the American people wake up and say enough? The few limitations we have on abortions, the right to own firearms, churches, you name it, it's is under attack right now.
A modern tea-bag protest has been proposed. On April 1st everyone is supposed to send a tea-bag to the White House in protest against the bailout plan. If only on the 1st we would find out that it was all one big "April Fool's" joke I'd be happy. I hate to waste a good tea bag.
A modern tea-bag protest has been proposed. On April 1st everyone is supposed to send a tea-bag to the White House in protest against the bailout plan. If only on the 1st we would find out that it was all one big "April Fool's" joke I'd be happy. I hate to waste a good tea bag.
Sunday, March 1, 2009
Just Thinking....
The Democrat's Stimulus Plan makes me think:
- Allegiance can sometimes be acquired through the "beneficence" of the giver.
- Beneficiaries of largesse are often lazy or crooked.
- That's my money they're handing out in order to buy power.
We have sold our country.
Since when have we become beggars??? -- as in, "Please buy our T-Bills and Bonds, we're broke."
It is hard not to be negative.....
Labels:
big government,
Democrat,
stimulus
Monday, February 23, 2009
The End of the Republic?
"When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic. Sell not liberty to purchase power." -- Benjamin Franklin
Saturday, January 24, 2009
A Lack of Confidence
Much of what is happening in the economy now is a function of the lack of confidence in the investing community and the American public at large. Throwing more money into the mix isn't going to do anything if confidence is not restored.
How do you restore confidence when your solution is to panic? That's what the proposed $825 billion rescue package is -- a panic response. MY response to more bailout funds is panic. I am fearful of what it will do to my children and grandchildren. They are the ones being asked to bail us out of the current economic situation. They are the ones who will pick up the bill.
The desire of the government seems to be to stimulate spending. Dollars flowing through the economy is important, however, my response will continue to be to pay off debt (of which I have little to start with) and to build savings. My kids will need something on which to survive. Since the greed-o-nomics of today is creating the problem, it falls on those of us who are able today, to set some aside for the survival of those who must face "the tomorrow" that is being created. I suspect there are others who think the same way. Result: pouring money into the economy through additional bailout funds will have little positive effect except to prop up failures.
The best way to restore confidence in the economy is not to send the message that the government wants more of your money; it is to send a message of fiscal responsibility. That is NOT what I'm hearing out of Washington -- past or present administration.
How do you restore confidence when your solution is to panic? That's what the proposed $825 billion rescue package is -- a panic response. MY response to more bailout funds is panic. I am fearful of what it will do to my children and grandchildren. They are the ones being asked to bail us out of the current economic situation. They are the ones who will pick up the bill.
The desire of the government seems to be to stimulate spending. Dollars flowing through the economy is important, however, my response will continue to be to pay off debt (of which I have little to start with) and to build savings. My kids will need something on which to survive. Since the greed-o-nomics of today is creating the problem, it falls on those of us who are able today, to set some aside for the survival of those who must face "the tomorrow" that is being created. I suspect there are others who think the same way. Result: pouring money into the economy through additional bailout funds will have little positive effect except to prop up failures.
The best way to restore confidence in the economy is not to send the message that the government wants more of your money; it is to send a message of fiscal responsibility. That is NOT what I'm hearing out of Washington -- past or present administration.
Friday, January 23, 2009
It Has Begun
It has begun.
First, we see the appointment of a darling of the HSUS (which by-the-way has NOTHING to do with your local animal shelters) to a key position.
Second, we see the CIA shackled so they can no longer do their job.
Third, we see Nancy Pelosi gloating over the exit of the now former President.
John Cornyn is the one bright spot that I see in Washington. He is becoming more-and-more vocal in his position of leadership of the opposition.
First, we see the appointment of a darling of the HSUS (which by-the-way has NOTHING to do with your local animal shelters) to a key position.
Second, we see the CIA shackled so they can no longer do their job.
Third, we see Nancy Pelosi gloating over the exit of the now former President.
John Cornyn is the one bright spot that I see in Washington. He is becoming more-and-more vocal in his position of leadership of the opposition.
Monday, January 12, 2009
Wait-and-see Optimism
I suppose it would be appropriate to say that I'm in a political holding pattern right now. It seems that wait-and-see is the best approach to the new administration.
There are some encouraging signs coming out of the President-elect -- but there are also plenty of discouraging ones. The message really isn't clear yet. Will it be the Pelosi/Reid line or will it be something else? Will political pragmatism rule the day or will it be ideology that determines the direction? Will Conservatives have any say in the next couple of years or will it be a left-wing steamroller? Today, the jury is out.
Why do I think the jury is still out? It is because I am an optimist at heart. I am optimistic that there remains enough balance in our country that we won't be captured by the socialist wannabes and instead will walk a somewhat centrist path.
In the interest of setting the stage for a second term, the President elect may choose such a path. At this date it remains to be seen.
There are some encouraging signs coming out of the President-elect -- but there are also plenty of discouraging ones. The message really isn't clear yet. Will it be the Pelosi/Reid line or will it be something else? Will political pragmatism rule the day or will it be ideology that determines the direction? Will Conservatives have any say in the next couple of years or will it be a left-wing steamroller? Today, the jury is out.
Why do I think the jury is still out? It is because I am an optimist at heart. I am optimistic that there remains enough balance in our country that we won't be captured by the socialist wannabes and instead will walk a somewhat centrist path.
In the interest of setting the stage for a second term, the President elect may choose such a path. At this date it remains to be seen.
Thursday, January 8, 2009
A Snapshot of the Economy in a Bright Spot
Yesterday I spent the day in the Nashville, TN, and Bowling Green, KY, area. Their economy seems to be perking along nicely. I understand that there have been some layoffs and the Corvette plant in Bowling Green may reduce production for a period, but all-in-all, it seems to be hopping.
Jobless numbers being reported are ugly. It continues to signal some fundamental restructuring within our economy. Our carmakers are inefficient -- due in part to regulation and in part to Union imposed overhead. That's where a lot of the jobless claim numbers are being generated.
I think we may be "surprised" to see the media coverage of the economy turn much more positive after the Inauguration of the new President. They must exercise their power and annoint The One. After all, they believe they made him what he is. I can't argue that point.
Jobless numbers being reported are ugly. It continues to signal some fundamental restructuring within our economy. Our carmakers are inefficient -- due in part to regulation and in part to Union imposed overhead. That's where a lot of the jobless claim numbers are being generated.
I think we may be "surprised" to see the media coverage of the economy turn much more positive after the Inauguration of the new President. They must exercise their power and annoint The One. After all, they believe they made him what he is. I can't argue that point.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)